c kinase 1 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

C Kinase 1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 50 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c kinase 1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 50 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Subcellular proteomic profiling of human skeletal muscle reveals exercise-induced coordinated and compartment-specific protein remodeling"
Article Title: Subcellular proteomic profiling of human skeletal muscle reveals exercise-induced coordinated and compartment-specific protein remodeling
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.08.703653
Figure Legend Snippet: a.) Heatmap of differentially expressed ribosomal proteins (adjusted P < 0.05) identified in the mitochondrial, nuclear, and cytosolic fractions. Colours indicate log□fold-change at each acute timepoint (MID, POST, 3H relative to PRE). b.) Scaled profile plots showing mean z-score changes of Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1 (RACK1) detected in the mitochondrial and nuclear fractions across PRE, MID, POST, and 3H. Subpanels illustrate trajectories for females (F), males (M) and combined sexes (F), obtained from the Subcell-EX Shiny app for visualising compartment- and sex-stratified comparisons. c.) Representative immunoblot images of RACK1 (5 µg total protein loaded per lane, including molecular weight marker and pooled control sample in the first lanes) across subcellular fractions (mitochondria, nucleus, cytosol) at PRE, MID, POST, and 3H. Lane colouring reflects fraction identity: mitochondria (peach), nucleus (blue), cytosol (green). A Stain-Free total protein image is shown below as a loading control. d) RACK1 subcellular protein abundance in response to exercise, determined using band densitometry and expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.). Quantified data are presented as mean ± SD for a representative subset of n = 10 participants (5 males, 5 females). Comparisons are shown for PRE, MID, POST, and 3H within each fraction (mitochondrial, nuclear, cytosolic). (*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.001) relative to PRE, determined by pairwise t-tests with Bonferroni correction.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Molecular Weight, Marker, Control, Staining, Quantitative Proteomics